Cases 41 - 50 of 1,004
MENDOZA v. MVM, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
MARIO MENDOZA, JR.
Defendant:
MVM, Inc. and KG&P STRATEGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-20399
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Parria v. Cvitanovich et al
as 2:2023cv03663
Plaintiff:
Shantel Parria
Defendant:
Joseph P. Lopinto, III, Kurt Zeagler, William Roniger and others
Cross Defendant:
Dana Troxclair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Preziosi v. Children & Family Services et al
as 5:2023cv01097
Plaintiff:
Stephen Paul Preziosi
Defendant:
LA Dept Children & Family Services, Terri P Ricks, Gary E Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Quinlan v. Lopinto
as 23-30490
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Pamela Quinlan
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph P. Lopinto, III, Sheriff, in his official capacity and Robert F. Stoltz, Jr., Deputy
Otero v. Rockport P. D. et al
as 2:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Mathew Otero
Defendant:
Rockport P. D. and Noah Leuschner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Montez v. Aguirre & Gonzalez
as 23-50480
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher Rick Montez
Defendant / Appellee:
Aguirre & Gonzalez, Ramos & Del Cueto, Jeffrey C. Anderson and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
