Cases 41 - 50 of 78
Bavineaux v. Augustine et al
as 4:2016cv03240
Plaintiff:
Dana Bavineaux
Defendant:
Stephen Augustine, Matt Ayers, D.O., Olaoluwa Okusaga, M.D. MSc PHR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv14882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Carlos Peterson v. Monroe County, et al
as 16-60544
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS PETERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MONROE COUNTY and ABERDEEN, MISSISSIPPI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00345
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Cause code unknown
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv00725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blount et al v. Mississippi Department of Human Services et al
as 3:2015cv00404
Plaintiff:
Windell C. Blount, Christopher E. Kelly-Patton, James M. Evans, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Human Services , Richard Berry , Linda Slaughter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Peterson et al v. City of Duncanville et al
as 3:2015cv00247
Plaintiff:
Kristine Peterson , Melissa Peterson , Sherry Horne and others
Defendant:
City of Duncanville, Robert D. Brown, Jr., John Doe I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Monroe County Aberdeen, MS
as 1:2015cv00015
Plaintiff:
Carlos Peterson
Defendant:
Monroe County and Aberdeen, MS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peterson et al v. Silverado Senior Living
as 4:2014cv02179
Defendant:
Silverado Senior Living
Plaintiff:
Mack Glen Peterson , Don Leslie Peterson and Lonny Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
