Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pittman v. Webster County, Mississippi
as 3:2009cv00015
Plaintiff:
Latisha Pittman
Defendant:
Webster County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Salinas v. City of Kingsville Texas et al
as 6:2008cv00078
Plaintiff:
Mercedes Salinas
Defendant:
City of Kingsville Texas, Arnoldo Salinas, Ricardo Torres and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Deshotels v. Norsworthy
as 2:2008cv01378
Plaintiff:
Ann Deshotels, Kimberly Ann Deshotels, Jamie Jourdan Deshotels and others
Defendant:
Gregory Paul Norsworthy, Kevin O'Rourke, Mike Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pittman v. Collin County Texas
as 4:2008cv00257
Defendant:
Collin County Texas
Plaintiff:
Linda Pittman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Washington et al v. Pittman et al
as 2:2008cv00041
Plaintiff:
Carlene Thomas Washington and Clifton Lee Thomas
Defendant:
Trey Pittman, Ephraim Torres, City Of Lumberton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
J.A. et al v. Barbour, et al
as 3:2007cv00394
Plaintiff:
J.A., J.A., J.A. and others
Defendant:
Mississippi Protection and Advocacy System, Inc., Mississippi Protection and Advocacy System, Inc., Mississippi Protection and Advocacy System, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
