Cases 41 - 50 of 65,251
Neuens v. City of McAllen Police Department
as 7:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Chris Neuens
Defendant:
City of McAllen Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Borchers v. Menchaca et al
as 2:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Jason Borchers
Defendant:
Jesse Menchaca and Gilbert Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-50383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Palo Pinto Cty Conservatives v. Long
as 24-10432
Plaintiff:
Palo Pinto County Conservatives, Grass Roots Mineral Wells PAC and Johanna Miller
Defendant:
Gary Glover, in his official capacity as Palo Pinto County commissioner, Mike Reed, in his official capacity as Palo Pinto County commissioner, Jeff Fryer, in his official capacity as Palo Pinto County commissioner and others
Sauceda v. City of San Benito
as 24-40174
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Sauceda
Defendant:
City of San Benito, Texas and Hector Lopez, Individually and in his official capacity as a Peace Officer for the City of San Benito, Texas Police Department
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Barber v. Katy Independent School District et al
as 4:2024cv01004
Plaintiff:
Staci Barber
Defendant:
Katy Independent School District and Bryan Scott Rounds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
