Cases 51 - 60 of 98
Glass v. Rudley et al
as 4:2014cv02142
Plaintiff:
Charles Glass
Defendant:
John M. Rudley, Sunny Ohia, Dionicio Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Willis et al v. City of Hattiesburg et al
as 2:2014cv00089
Plaintiff:
Sandra Willis , David Knight , Charmaine Willis and others
Defendant:
City of Hattiesburg , Frazier Bolton , Scott Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00305
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Axcess Medical Clinic, Inc. et al v. Mississippi State Board of Medical Licensure
as 3:2014cv00112
Plaintiff:
Axcess Medical Clinic, Inc. , Kenneth Charles Knight and Fitzhugh Lee Neal, Jr.
Defendant:
Mississippi State Board of Medical Licensure
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00604
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Prespentt vs. Harris County, et al
as 4:2013cv01678
Plaintiff:
Travis Prespentt
Defendant:
Harris County, Ronald Hickman, Tramine Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Knight et al v. Mississippi State Board of Medical Licensure
as 3:2013cv00321
Plaintiff:
Kenny Knight , Fitzhugh Lee Neal, Jr. and Michelle Lai
Defendant:
Mississippi State Board of Medical Licensure
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-60272
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
