Cases 61 - 70 of 71
Woods v. Russ
as 10-20378
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Woods
Defendant / Appellee:
Charles Russ, Arlene Parchman, Douglas Vance and others
Vance v. Jeff Anderson Regional Medical Center
as 4:2009cv00180
Plaintiff:
Monica D. Vance
Defendant:
Jeff Anderson Regional Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv06830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Woods v. Russ et al
as 4:2009cv02541
Plaintiff:
James Woods
Defendant:
Charles Russ, Arlene Parchman, Douglas Vance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vance v. Texas Department of Health and Human Services
as 3:2008cv00110
Plaintiff:
Charles Anthony Vance
Defendant:
Texas Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sullivan et al v. Weltner et al
as 5:2008cv00320
Plaintiff:
Kevin Sullivan, Alex Schuring and Ann Sullivan
Defendant:
Vance Weltner, Vance Weltner and Bob Holder
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 07-10818
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Anderson v. AMFED Companies, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00271
Plaintiff:
T. James Anderson, Jr.
Defendant:
AMFED Companies, Inc., The State of Mississippi, The Mississippi Institutions of Higher Learning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sheridan v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2007cv00587
Plaintiff:
John Paul Sheridan
Defendant:
Alberto R Gonzales, Superior Court of Calilfornia, Eldorado County District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
