Cases 61 - 70 of 65,430
Bauer v. Smith
as 3:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Ty K. Bauer
Defendant:
Kent Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pinnacle Medical Solutions, LLC et al v. Louisiana Healthcare Connections, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
Pinnacle Medical Solutions, LLC and Diabetes Management & Supplies, LLC
Defendant:
Louisiana Healthcare Connections, Inc., Centene Corporation and Ralph L Abraham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Brumlow v. Shreveport et al
as 5:2024cv00741
Petitioner:
Khaleb L Brumlow
Defendant:
City of Shreveport, DeSoto Parish Sheriff, Unknown DeSoto Parish Sheriff Deputy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Condon v. 3M Company
as 6:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
Joseph M Condon
Respondent:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Guzman v. Escapade01 LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01344
Plaintiff:
Lucia Guzman
Defendant:
Escapade01 LLC doing business as Escapade 2001 Dallas, Escapade Club Corporation and Escapade09, LLC doing business as Escapade Club 2009
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Brown v. Hinds County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Joseph Brown
Defendant:
Hinds County, Mississippi, Sheriff Tyree Jones and John and Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-20240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-30341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
