Cases 71 - 80 of 181
Jay Cooper, et al v. USA, et al
as 15-41096
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAY S. COOPER and TERESA WARD COOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, PATRICK R. DONAHOE, Postmaster General and Chief Executive Officer of the United States Postal Service and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-30683
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00033
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-41085
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Cazares Santillan et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2014cv00114
Plaintiff:
Ernestina Cazares Santillan , Amada Carolina Martinez Morales , Claudia Elizabeth Torres Orantes and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Unknown Named Agents of the United States Border Patrol, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mohammad Katouzi v. DHS
as 14-50635
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMMAD SADEGH KATOUZI
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-60312
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
