Cases 71 - 80 of 98
Knight v. City of Balch Springs et al
as 3:2011cv01122
Plaintiff:
Hellian Knight
Defendant:
City of Balch Springs and Balch Springs Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ellis et al v. Bogalusa City et al
as 2:2011cv00534
Plaintiff:
Willie E. Ellis, Jr. and Aunitre L. Fields
Defendant:
Bogalusa City, Jerry W. Agnew, Sr., Joe Culpepper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clottee Knight v. MS Department of Corrections, et al
as 10-60868
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLOTEE KNIGHT, Administrator of the Estate of Michael Davenport, Deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOES 1-5 and HERMAN WESLEY KNIGHT, In His Individual Capacity and Official Capacity
Knight v. Tenaris Global Services USA Corp
as 2:2010cv02787
Plaintiff:
Connie Knight
Defendant:
Tenaris Global Services USA Corp doing business as Hydril Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv02973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lemon et al v. Montague County, Texas
as 7:2010cv00094
Plaintiff:
Shelley Wrea Lemon , Lashanda Dykes and Dwanita Knight
Defendant:
Montague County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01463
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Frederick v. Itawamba County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2009cv00297
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Jo Frederick
Defendant:
Itawamba County, Mississippi and Kenneth Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Forch v. Knight-Abbey Commercial Printers
as 1:2009cv00759
Plaintiff:
Phillip Forch
Defendant:
Knight-Abbey Commercial Printers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
