Cases 81 - 90 of 576
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bradford et al v. City of Tatum, Texas et al
as 6:2022cv00406
Plaintiff:
Adam Chase Bradford, Paloma Bradford, Jane Doe and others
Defendant:
City of Tatum, Texas, Parker Sweeney, Kenneth Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Yasin v. Adams
as 4:2022cv03491
Plaintiff:
Sharon Yasin
Defendant:
Wanda Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-30632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
McKinney v. Johnson County Texas et al
as 3:2022cv02264
Plaintiff:
Shawna McKinney
Defendant:
Johnson County, Texas, Sheriff Adam King, David Blankenship and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Adams v. The City of Taft et al
as 2:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Marcus E Adams
Defendant:
The City of Taft, Joe Sandoval and Melissa Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
