Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Ivey v. Polk County et al
as 6:2023cv00422
Plaintiff:
Jannice Ivey
Defendant:
Texas Polk County and Byron Lyons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Bravo et al v. Pelosi et al
as 6:2021cv00162
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Bravo, P. P., Lindsey Nguyen and others
Defendant:
Mark Zuckerberg, Mike Podhorzer, Pete Sessions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00008
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Moore v. Clarke County, MS et al
as 3:2020cv00464
Defendant:
Clarke County, MS, Sheriff Todd Kemp, John Does 1-4 and others
Plaintiff:
Erin Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCormack v. Myart
as 5:2019cv00862
Cross Defendant:
Bexar County, TX, Laura Cole, County Judge Nelson W. Wolff and others
Plaintiff:
Mccormack Barron Management and James W. Myart, Jr.
Cross Claimant:
James Myart, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carman v. County of Collin, Texas et al
as 4:2018cv00717
Defendant:
Stephen Howell, Cie Gardez, Kalyn Rosser and others
Plaintiff:
Amy Carman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Brewster et al
as 1:2017cv01173
Defendant:
Bell County, Texas, Whitney Brewster, City of Belton and others
Plaintiff:
Wesley Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Randall v. L-3 Communications Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv03000
Plaintiff:
Vera-Jean Randall
Defendant:
L-3 Communications Corporation , John T De Monic, Jr and James Daniel Ivey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
