Cases 1 - 10 of 1,677
Elzey v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Sorita Elzey
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Seth Smith, Chris Stinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Bauer v. Smith
as 3:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Ty K. Bauer
Defendant:
Kent Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mayfield v. City of College Station
as 24-20213
Plaintiff:
Helen Tyne Mayfield and James Campbell
Defendant:
City of College Station, City of Bryan, Brazos County and others
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Evans v. USA
as 24-40300
Plaintiff:
Christy G. Evans
Defendant:
United States of America, Lisa Greenway, Carrie Gilliam and others
Est of La'Mello Parker v. MS Dept
as 24-60208
Plaintiff:
Estate of La'Mello Parker and L. S., a minor, by and through Kevin Smith his next friend, individually and on behalf of all entitled to recover
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Public Safety, Troy Peterson, Harrison County Sheriff, in his individual and official capacities, Harrison County, Mississippi and others
Smith v. Attorney General of Texas
as 3:2024cv01008
Plaintiff:
David Smith
Defendant:
Attorney General of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-40264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
