Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lang et al v. Medical City Children's Hospital
as 3:2022cv02320
Plaintiff:
Wenhuai Lang, Long Xiu Li and Alina Lang
Defendant:
Medical City Children's Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Li v. Resolution Energy Services et al
as 4:2022cv03084
Plaintiff:
Li Li
Defendant:
Resolution Energy Services and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cascino v. Scott
as 22-50748
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Daniel Cascino, Shanda Marie Sansing and Brenda Li Garcia
Defendant / Appellee:
John B. Scott, Texas Secretary of State
Wiemken et al v. Gurrola et al
as 4:2021cv03355
Plaintiff:
Kevin-Neal Wiemken and Greg Earl Wiemken
Defendant:
Becky Gurrola, Ellen Shelburne, Robbin Knebel and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
