Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Johnson v. Duke University Hospital NC et al
as 2:2021cv01751
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Duke University Hospital NC, CDC Government, United Nations and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parham et al v. Watson et al
as 3:2020cv00572
Defendant:
Lynn Fitch and Michael D. Watson, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Jed Oppenheim, Mississippi State Conference of the N.A.A.C.P., League of Women Voters Mississippi and others
Amicus Curiae:
The State of California, The State of New York, The State of Rhode Island and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson Women's Hlth Org v. Dobbs
as 19-60455
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JACKSON WOMEN'S HEALTH ORGANIZATION, on behalf of itself and its patients and SACHEEN CARR-ELLIS, M.D., M.P.H., on behalf of herself and her patients
Defendant / Appellant:
KENNETH CLEVELAND, M.D., in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Mississippi State Board of Medical Licensure and THOMAS E. DOBBS, M.D., M.P.H., in his official capacity as State Health Officer of the Mississippi Department of Health
Amicus Curiae:
Roman Catholic Diocese of Jackson, Mississippi, Roman Catholic Diocese of Biloxi, Mississippi, Information Society Project at Yale Law School and others
Dukes v. Connecticut
as 3:2017cv02270
Plaintiff:
Rico Cortez Dukes
Defendant:
Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kennedy v. The State of Alabama et al
as 5:2016cv01116
Defendant:
Democratic National Party, Republican National Party, State of Connecticut and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sinclair v. Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut
as 2:2011cv00015
Plaintiff:
Derek Keith Sinclair
Defendant:
Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut
as 3:2010cv01628
Plaintiff:
Novella Robinson
Defendant:
Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
