Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Ogbonna v. City of Nacogdoches
as 4:2021cv00296
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Ogbonna
Defendant:
City of Nacogdoches, Cardinal Street Housing, L.P. doing business as The Overlook at Nacogdoches and Josh Anders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. Bogan et al
as 3:2020cv00388
Defendant:
Baton Rouge Police Department, Zantavia Hamilton Bogan, Heather Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Lydia McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ESI/Employee Solutions, LP et al v. City of Dallas et al
as 4:2019cv00570
Defendant:
Dallas City of, T.C. Broadnax, Eric Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
ESI/Employee Solutions, LP, Hagan Law Group LLC and State Of Texas
Amicus Curiae:
Choice Staffing, LLC, eEmployers Solutions, Inc., The Burnett Companies Consolidated, Inc. d/b/a Burnett Specialists and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01813
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02935
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
