Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Lopez v. Kendall et al
as 5:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Arturo S. Lopez, Sr.
Defendant:
Frank Kendall, III, Daniel Peterson, Anthony Scharf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hayes v. The City of Magee, Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv00327
Plaintiff:
Virginia Hayes
Defendant:
The City of Magee, Mississippi, Charles R. Crawford, Vernon Dampier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Title III Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv00067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv00145
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Jones v. Woodspring Suites LLC
as 4:2016cv01701
Plaintiff:
Charles R Jones
Defendant:
Woodspring Suites LLC and Value Place Property Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Lucien v. Jones et al
as 2:2016cv09591
Plaintiff:
Robert Lucien, Sr.
Defendant:
Derrick Jones, Sr., John M. Blanchard, Law Office of John M. Blanchard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lester v. Caddo Parish et al
as 5:2015cv02008
Plaintiff:
James Hayward Lester
Defendant:
District Attorneys Office Caddo Parish, Charles R Scott, Dale Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Caddo Parish et al
as 5:2015cv00544
Plaintiff:
Glenn Ford
Defendant:
District Attorney Caddo Parish , Paul Carmouche , Charles R Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
