Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Davis et al v. County of Jones, Mississippi et al
as 2:2020cv00176
Plaintiff:
William D. Davis and Michelle Marlene Bender Davis
Defendant:
Other Unknown Defendants, Deputies and Employees of the County of Jones, Mississippi, Tonya Madison, County of Jones, Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Kirkham et al
as 4:2020cv00074
Plaintiff:
William D. Davis
Defendant:
John Does 1-5 and Marco Kirkham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Barnes v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv00952
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Other Undisclosed BODA Attorneys, Russell Travis and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Neighbors Federal Credit Union
as 3:2017cv01785
Plaintiff:
Keela D. Davis
Defendant:
Neighbors Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Anna Davis v. Jack Strain, et al
as 16-30169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANNA D. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK STRAIN, in his official capacity as Sheriff of St. Tammany Parish and JOHN MORSE, Sergeant
Davis v. Strain et al
as 2:2014cv01086
Defendant:
Jack Strain and Katherine Domangue
Plaintiff:
Anna D. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. Pearl River County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2010cv00283
Plaintiff:
Brent Michael Turner
Defendant:
Pearl River County, Mississippi, David Allison, Anthony Hales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv01668
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
