Civil Rights Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 143
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00549
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Holmes v. White
as 24-30194
Plaintiff: Michael R. Holmes
Defendant: Robert Michael White, individually and in his official capacity as Assistant District Attorney, Charles J. Ballay, individually and in his official capacity as District Attorney, Daniel R. Martiny and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00436
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00011
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Crittendon v. Holmes
as 1:2023cv00357
Plaintiff: Norman Crittendon
Defendant: Mark Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Reddoch
as 23-30424
Plaintiff / Appellee: Michael R. Holmes
Defendant / Appellant: Corbett Reddoch and Gerald A. Turlich, Jr., in his official capacity as sheriff of Plaquemines Parish
Holmes v. Baker Hughes
as 4:2023cv02171
Plaintiff: Richard Holmes
Defendant: Baker Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wilborn v. Holmes County
as 23-60277
Plaintiff / Appellant: Kelsey Wilborn, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee: Holmes County, Warden Barry Rule, Sheriff Willie March and others
Holmes v. White et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01247
Plaintiff: Michael R. Holmes
Defendant: Robert M. White and Charles J. Ballay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Sch Bd of Avoyelles Prsh
as 23-30029
Intervenor Plaintiff: Allen Holmes, individually and obo minor child Q H
Defendant / Appellee: School Board of Avoyelles Parish

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?