Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Derbes v. State of Louisiana, through Louisiana Attorney General, Department of Justice Department of Justice
as 3:2024cv00488
Plaintiff:
Matthew Derbes
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, through Louisiana Attorney General, Department of Justice Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-40336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Buchanan v. USA
as 24-50194
Plaintiff:
Rickey Buchanan, Sr.
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of the Army, Department of the Air Force and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Buchanan v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00663
Plaintiff:
Rickey Buchanan
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of the Army, Department of the Air Force and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00980
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cantu v. Texas Youth Commission-Evins Regional Juvenile Center et al
as 7:2021cv00413
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Cantu
Defendant:
Texas Youth Commission-Evins Regional Juvenile Center, Texas Juvenile Justice Department and Gabe Atsu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodrow Jones, Sr. v. Texas Juvenile Justice Dept
as 17-40488
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WOODROW J. JONES, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS JUVENILE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, Interim Executive Director (David Reilly)
Lewis v. Texas Juvenile Justice Department, et al
as 4:2017cv00161
Plaintiff:
Roy Lewis, Jr
Defendant:
Texas Juvenile Justice Department , Gainesville State School and The State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
