Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Clouse v. Southern Methodist Univ
as 24-10461
Plaintiff:
Jessica Clouse, Lindsay Heyman, Meghan Klein and others
Defendant:
Southern Methodist University
Harrington v. Lancaster
as 24-20230
Plaintiff:
Tyler Harrington
Defendant:
James Lancaster and Jared Lindsay
Miller v. Dunn et al
as 3:2024cv00889
Plaintiff:
Bradley B Miller
Defendant:
Virginia Talley Dunn, The Hockaday School, Laura Leathers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Drake v. FedEx Ground Package System Inc
as 3:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System Inc, Molly Smith, Arthur William Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Harrington v. Lancaster et al
as 4:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
Tyler Harrington
Defendant:
James Lancaster, Nathaniel Cano and Jared Lindsay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diggles v. Lindsay Law Firm
as 23-20594
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Latosha Diggles
Defendant / Appellee:
Lindsay Law Firm P.L.L.C., Texas Farmers Insurance Company, Ninth Court of Appeals and others
Diggles v. Surratt
as 23-20564
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Latosha Diggles
Defendant / Appellee:
Donean Surratt, David Fisher, Michael J. Lindsay, In his individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Retro Metro, LLC. et al v. City of Jackson et al
as 3:2023cv00592
Plaintiff:
Retro Metro, LLC., Leroy Walker, Socrates Garrett and others
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Mayor Chokwe Antar Lumumba, Vernon Hartley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
