Cases 1 - 10 of 457
Matthews v. Leflore County, Mississippi et al
as 4:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Kevin Matthews
Defendant:
Leflore County, Mississippi, Leflore County Board of Supervisors, Johnny Gary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martiez et al v. State Trooper Mitchell et al
as 4:2024cv01761
Plaintiff:
Nelson D Martiez and Phuong T Martinez
Defendant:
State Trooper Mitchell and State Trooper Lara
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Demunbrun v. Estep et al
as 4:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Demunbrun
Defendant:
Detective Mitchell Estep and Detective Paul Keith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2024cv00995
Plaintiff:
Jaimee Williams
Defendant:
Brandon Mitchell, Lakefront Airport and Lakefront
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stanwyck v. City of Rhome et al
as 4:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Marc Stanwyck
Defendant:
City of Rhome, Eric Debus, Carvan Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Drake v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
Stephanie Nicole Mitchell, Chika Anyiam, Dallas County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
