Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Newton v. Akers
as 4:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Sye Newton
Defendant:
Cordt Cullen Akers d/b/a The Akers Firm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Payne v. County Of Harris et al
as 4:2023cv03067
Plaintiff:
Joseph Keith Payne
Defendant:
County Of Harris, CITY OF HOUSTON, HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE and others
Amicus Curiae:
Attorney General of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Molina et al v. Bastrop County, et al.
as 1:2022cv00452
Plaintiff:
Eunice Prieto Molina and Leidi Silvestre
Defendant:
Bastrop County Sheriff's Office, Chris Griffin, Stevie Shae Burchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Newton v. Canadian National Railway Company
as 3:2021cv00373
Defendant:
Terrence K. Newton, Sr. and Canadian National Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Canadian Real Estate Holdings, LP v. Karen F. Newton Revocable Trust et al.
as 4:2021cv00333
Defendant:
KAREN F. NEWTON REVOCABLE TRUST, Richard Vanmeter, Kristin Trotter and others
Plaintiff:
CANADIAN REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brown v. Newton County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2021cv00294
Defendant:
Newton County, Mississippi, Joedy Pennington, John Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
James Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
