Cases 1 - 10 of 213
Roake et al v. Brumley et al
as 3:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
Darcy Roake, Adrian Van Young, Mamie Broadhurst and others
Defendant:
Cade Brumley, Conrad Appel, Judy Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Mayfield v. City of College Station
as 24-20213
Plaintiff:
Helen Tyne Mayfield and James Campbell
Defendant:
City of College Station, City of Bryan, Brazos County and others
Merriweather v. Owens
as 3:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Kendall Merriweather
Defendant:
Justin Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Hassan v. Sherman
as 24-40121
Plaintiff:
Christina Hassan, on behalf of the Estate of Christopher Lee, J.H., by and through his guardian April Hughes, J.I., by and through their guardian Tausha Idlebird and others
Defendant:
Joshua Sherman, John Owens and Jason Alpers
Haire v. 5445 Caruth
as 24-10137
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Haire
Defendant:
5445 Caruth Haven Lane Apartments Owner, L.L.C., Lincoln Property Company, Incorporated, Travis Bowles, in his capacity as Regional Manager of Lincoln Property Company, Incorporated and others
Kendricks v. DOJ
as 24-50171
Plaintiff:
Sheila Denise Kendricks
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, State of Texas Attorney General, Methodist Children's Home and others
Kendricks v. DOJ
as 24-50057
Plaintiff:
Sheila Denise Kendricks
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, State of Texas Attorney General, Methodist Children's Home and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
