Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Rayford v. City of Schertz et al
as 5:2022cv01328
Plaintiff:
Zekee Rayford
Defendant:
City of Schertz, Michael R. Hansen, Chavarria Frank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hebrew v. Collier et al
as 4:2021cv02929
Plaintiff:
Elimelech Shmi Hebrew
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Rayford O Irvin and Christian D. Menefee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carr v. Rayford
as 2:2021cv00127
Respondent:
J Rayford
Petitioner:
Willie Ty'rone Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rayford v. Crain et al
as 2:2019cv12348
Defendant:
Denise Robertson, Lisa Crain, April Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Rayford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry Rayford v. Bogalusa City, et al
as 18-30386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY RAYFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
BOGALUSA CITY, JOE CULPEPPER, Chief of Police, JAMES COCKRELL, PFC, Individually and As Police Officer of the Bogalusa Police Department and others
Henry Rayford v. Bogalusa City
as 18-30386
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Henry Rayford
Defendant / Appellee:
Bogalusa City, Joe Culpepper, Chief of Police, James Cockrell, PFC, Individually and As Police Officer of the Bogalusa Police Department and others
Rayford v. Bogalusa City et al
as 2:2015cv01296
Plaintiff:
Henry Rayford
Defendant:
Bogalusa City , Joe Culpepper , James Cockrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv00526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Alamo Colleges et al
as 5:2014cv00415
Defendant:
Alamo Colleges, Kristen Alizondo, Frank Autery and others
Plaintiff:
Rayford Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
