Civil Rights Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv03242
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Santoyo v. Bexar Cty
as 19-50124
Defendant / Appellee: DANIEL BIBLE, United States Immigration and Enforcement, KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ENRIQUE M. LUCERO, Field Office Director for the San Antonio Field Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JULIO TRUJILLO SANTOYO
Julio Santoyo v. Bexar County, Texas, et al
as 17-51005
Plaintiff - Appellant: JULIO TRUJILLO SANTOYO
Defendant - Appellee: BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, ENRIQUE M. LUCERO, Field Office Director for the San Antonio Field Office, JOHN DOE 1-5, Employees of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Stefany Vega Duron, et al v. Ron Johnson, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-60460
Plaintiff - Appellant: STEFANY VEGA DURON, a Minor, and, BRITTANY ELIZABETH VEGA DURON, a Minor, by and Through Their Father and Next Friend, MARTIN DURON ESPARZA and others
Defendant - Appellee: RON JOHNSON, Individually, and in His Official Capacity as Director of the Mississippi Field Office of the United States Immigration and Custom Enforcement Division of the United States Department of Homeland Security; and and DERRICK MCCLUNG, an Immigration Officer of the Mississippi Field Office of the United States Immigration and Custom Enforcement Division of the United States Department of Homeland Security
Camargo v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency
as 7:2015cv00316
Plaintiff: Hortencia Camargo
Defendant: United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Gabriel Gaytan and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Cazares Santillan et al v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00114
Plaintiff: Ernestina Cazares Santillan , Amada Carolina Martinez Morales , Claudia Elizabeth Torres Orantes and others
Defendant: United States of America, Unknown Named Agents of the United States Border Patrol, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cazares Santillan et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv00149
Plaintiff: Ernestina Cazares Santillan and Amada Carolina Martinez Morales
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States Border Patrol, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Jesus Hernandez, et al v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-50792
Plaintiff - Appellant: JESUS C. HERNANDEZ, Individually and as the surviving father of Sergio Adrian Hernandez Guereca, and as Successor-in-Interest to the Estate of Sergio Adrian Hernandez Guereca and MARIA GUADALUPE GUERE BENTACOUR, Individually and as the surviving father of Sergio Adrian Hernandez Guereca, and as Successor-in-Interest to the Estate of Sergio Adrian Hernandez Guereca
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS OF THE UNITED STATES BORDER PATROL, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Hernandez, et al. vs The United States of America, et al. Featured Case
as 6:2011cv00013
Plaintiff: Maria Guadalupe Guere Bentacour and Jesus C Hernandez
Defendant: The United States of America, United States Border Patrol, United States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Hernandez, et al. vs The United States of America, et al.
as 3:2011cv00027
Plaintiff: Maria Guadalupe Guere Bentacour and Jesus C Hernandez
Defendant: The United States of America, United States Border Patrol, United States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?