Cases 1 - 10 of 115
Clark v. Dept of Public Safety
as 24-30201
Plaintiff:
Torriana Clark
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety and Corrections, State of Louisiana, Lance Wallace, Sergeant and Travis Day, Warden
Price v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
Quincy Price
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Warden Keith Cooley, Assistant Warden Brent Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Newson v. Douglas et al
as 3:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Devoris Newson
Defendant:
Richard D. Douglas, Robert W. Wedemeyer, Camille R. McMullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. East Mississippi Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2023cv02959
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Dixon
Defendant:
East Mississippi Correctional Facility, Jane/John Doe, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Perry v. Jones County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
Daniel Perry
Defendant:
Jones County, Mississippi, Officer J.D. Carter, Officer Jeff Monk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wilborn v. Holmes County
as 23-60277
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kelsey Wilborn, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Holmes County, Warden Barry Rule, Sheriff Willie March and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
McPhearson v. Windham et al
as 3:2022cv05485
Plaintiff:
Robert McPhearson
Defendant:
Jeff Windham, Unknown Guard 1, Unknown Guard 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
