Cases 1 - 10 of 616
Reddell v. Rankin County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Joyce Reddell
Defendant:
Rankin County, Mississippi, Vitalcore Health Strategies, LLC, David Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Mills et al
as 4:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
John D. White
Defendant:
Dee Ann Mills and Danielle Parsons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Wesley Chapel Water System, Inc
as 3:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Lee White
Defendant:
Wesley Chapel Water System Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Claiborne Electric Cooperative, Inc
as 5:2024cv00590
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Lee White
Defendant:
Claiborne Electric Cooperative Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-50240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Holmes v. White
as 24-30194
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Holmes
Defendant:
Robert Michael White, individually and in his official capacity as Assistant District Attorney, Charles J. Ballay, individually and in his official capacity as District Attorney, Daniel R. Martiny and others
White v. Liggins
as 1:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth White
Defendant:
De'Angelo Liggins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ward v. City of Allen
as 24-40144
Plaintiff:
Cassady Ward
Defendant:
City of Allen, Brian E. Harvey, Chief, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Allen Chief of Police, Steven May, Lieutenant, Individually and in his Offical Capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ellis v. City of White Settlement
as 4:2024cv00132
Petitioner:
Eric L. Ellis
Respondent:
City of White Settlement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
