Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Grant v. Barr, et al
as 5:2023cv00883
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, William Barr and James A. Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Grant, II v. Baker et al
as 7:2020cv00232
Defendant:
James A. Baker, Commander In Chief of the U.S. Armed Forces and State of Illinois
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant, II v. Baker et al
as 5:2020cv00131
Petitioner:
William Lee Grant, II
Defendant:
Commander In Chief of the U.S. Armed Forces, James A Baker, III and State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant, II v. Baker et al
as 1:2020cv00126
Defendant:
James A Baker, State of Illinois and Chairman of the U.S. National Security Council
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grant, II v. Baker et al
as 1:2020cv00125
Defendant:
Commander-In-Chief, James A Baker and State of Illinois
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grant, II v. Baker et al
as 1:2020cv00123
Defendant:
President of the United States, James A Baker, State of Illinois and others
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grant v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 2:2019cv13747
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Defendant:
Special Collection Service and Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Grant, II v. US Department of Defense
as 18-11013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
William Grant, II v. TREA
as 18-10809
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
Grant II v. U.S. Department of Defense
as 4:2018cv00443
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant II
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
