Cases 91 - 100 of 1,764
Nall v. Lofton et al
as 6:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Dustin W. Nall
Defendant:
Cynthia Lofton, Assist. Warden FNU Akwitti, Michael Alsobrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Spence
as 22-11252
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Holston Banks, III
Defendant / Appellee:
John H. Spence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dowell v. Kobayashi et al
as 4:2022cv04486
Plaintiff:
Matthew Scott Dowell
Defendant:
Warden H. Kobayashi and Troy Dorett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Middleton Unit et al
as 1:2022cv00192
Plaintiff:
Colby T B Smith
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Middleton Unit, H Miller, Robert Thoemke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Collier et al
as 1:2022cv00586
Plaintiff:
Reuben Reed
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Oscar Mendoza, Jessica Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Sollie
as 3:2022cv00694
Plaintiff:
Tito M. H. Edwards
Defendant:
Billie Sollie
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gibson v. Hanna
as 22-11165
Petitioner / Appellant:
Scottie H. Gibson
Respondent / Appellee:
Dale S. Hanna, District Attorney
Ensley v. Verizon Wireless et al
as 2:2022cv04651
Plaintiff:
Mark H. Ensley
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless, PURETALK USA, AT&T and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ensley v. Foster et al
as 2:2022cv04649
Plaintiff:
Mark H. Ensley
Defendant:
Michelle Foster, New Orleans Metropolitan Crime Commision, Rafael C. Goyeneche, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
