Cases 91 - 100 of 174
Franklin v. Doyle et al
as 4:2017cv01163
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Franklin
Defendant:
Larry G. Doyle, Sharon D. Allen, John D. Stubblefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Davis et al
as 6:2017cv00104
Plaintiff:
Bruce D Williams
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Amanda Collins, Kevin Wheat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Hinds County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Dion Morris
Defendant:
Hinds County Board of Supervisors, Hinds County Sheriff's Department, All Defendants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caraway v. Emitt et al
as 4:2016cv03617
Plaintiff:
Robinson Edward Caraway
Defendant:
Ed Emitt, Ron Hickman, Sergeant Wolfford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheldon Nathan v. Corrections Corp. of America, et al
as 16-60768
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHELDON NATHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA (CCA) and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-100
Hale v. Hopson et al
as 3:2016cv00772
Plaintiff:
John Ashley Hale
Defendant:
N.P. Hopson, John or Jane Doe for Boswell, Nurse Nichels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonio Byrd v. Department of Corrections, et al
as 16-60473
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO BYRD
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, State of Mississippi, HALEY BARBOUR, Governor of State of Mississippi, MARSHALL L. FISHER, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Hernandez v. Management & Training Corporation et al
as 5:2016cv00057
Plaintiff:
Jose Hernandez
Defendant:
Management & Training Corporation and John and Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randle v. Patel
as 1:2016cv00210
Plaintiff:
Willie Randle
Defendant:
Pinkee Patel, James Johnson, David Hamel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Davenport et al
as 3:2016cv00085
Plaintiff:
Torey Cortez Smith
Defendant:
Cully Davenport, Dexter Gates, Chip Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
