Cases 111 - 120 of 1,096
Scott v. Haines
as 22-50519
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Phillip G. Scott
Defendant / Appellee:
Sergeant FNU Haines, Comal County Jail, Cert. Officer FNU Andrade, #3375, Comal County Jail, Officer FNU Hayes, #3400, Comal County Jail and others
Gonzalez v. Baugh et al
as 9:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Michael A Gonzalez
Defendant:
Korie A Baugh, Christopher A Farrell, Penelope Dorson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nall v. Lofton et al
as 6:2022cv00608
Plaintiff:
Dustin W. Nall
Defendant:
Cynthia Lofton, Assist. Warden FNU Akwitti, Michael Alsobrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carson v. Bonner et al
as 3:2022cv00293
Plaintiff:
Phillip Carson
Defendant:
Michael R. Bonner, Travis Vance, Richard Smith and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv01855
Petitioner:
Phillip J. Moore
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dixon v. Mason et al
as 5:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Dakota Dixon
Defendant:
Wanda Mason, Derick Hester and Aubrey Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Baugh et al
as 9:2022cv00082
Plaintiff:
Michael Angel Gonzales
Defendant:
Korie Baugh, Christopher A. Farrell, Kurtis D. Pharr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curtis v. Reeves et al
as 3:2022cv00270
Plaintiff:
Terry Curtis
Defendant:
Govornor Tate Reeves, Commisioner Burl Cain, Dr John Doe Brazier and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00417
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Johnson v. Hooper
as 22-30284
Petitioner / Appellant:
Phillip Orlando Ealy Johnson
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
