Cases 141 - 150 of 12,607
Andrews v. York et al
as 3:2023cv02294
Plaintiff:
William Andrews
Defendant:
Charlie York, Robert Johnson and Elmer Tanner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demison v. Collier et al
as 9:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Robert Demison, III
Defendant:
Brain Collier, Lorie Davis, William Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00162
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Joseph v. Jefferson
as 23-40615
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Demetrius Sherman Joseph, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
William R. Jefferson, Jr., Christopher A. Wood, Mark A. Callahan and others
Douglas v. Cain et al
as 3:2023cv03130
Plaintiff:
William Frederick Douglas
Defendant:
Commissioner Burl Cain, Jasmine Magee, Kelley Christopher and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prestage v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2023cv03023
Plaintiff:
William Allen Prestage
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberts v. Ramey et al
as 1:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
William Jeffrey Roberts
Defendant:
Michael Ramey, Karl Kourtney, Corrie Gann Robbins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Lumpkin
as 23-11188
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jaylan Rochard Williams, Sr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Krieg v. Blake
as 23-40614
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William Henry Krieg
Defendant / Appellee:
James E. Blake, Chibuike M. Omwuka, Fernater J. Smith and others
Williams v. State Of Texas et al
as 9:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
Brandon D. Williams
Defendant:
State Of Texas and Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
