Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 181 - 190 of 165,430
Billingslea v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01140
Petitioner: Darrell Bernard Billingslea
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01754
Petitioner: Robert Cor'Darius Taylor
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zarate v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00278
Plaintiff: Isaac Zarate
Defendant: Warden FNU Coger, Warden FNU Gould, Warden FNU Feazel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01084
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wall v. Myers
as 1:2024cv00378
Plaintiff: Cory Wall and Cory W Wall
Defendant: Marcus Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mathews v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01755
Petitioner: Mike Naoyuki Mathews
Respondent: TDCJ, Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hughes v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00479
Petitioner: Darren Tramell Hughes
Respondent: Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mayes v. Simpson County Adult Detention Center
as 3:2024cv00262
Plaintiff: Howard Leon Mayes, III and Duke
Defendant: Simpson County Adult Detention Center
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. USA
as 2:2024cv00098
Petitioner: Isaac Hernandez
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bush v. Warden, FCI Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00163
Petitioner: Frederick Bush
Respondent: Warden, FCI Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?