Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Vallo v. Cooley et al
as 2:2017cv00719
Plaintiff:
Princeton S Vallo
Defendant:
Keith Cooley, Rachael Courville, Travis Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bakre v. Steven et al
as 6:2017cv00239
Plaintiff:
Ash Babatunde Bakre
Defendant:
Sperry Steven, Susan Biscoe and John Dow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Ash et al
as 2:2017cv00215
Plaintiff:
Jaime Hernandez
Defendant:
Jason Ash, Clark, Keith Cooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott Zirus v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-50761
Petitioner - Appellant:
SCOTT ASH JAMES ZIRUS
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Scott Zirus v. Sharon Keller, et al
as 16-50560
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT ASH JAMES ZIRUS
Defendant - Appellee:
SHARON FAYE KELLER, in her official capacity, LAWRENCE E. MEYERS, in his official capacity, BERT RICHARDSON, in his official capacity and others
Zirus v. Keller et al
as 1:2016cv00428
Defendant:
Elsa Alcala, M. Rex Emerson, Barbara P. Hervey and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Ash James Zirus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott Zirus v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-50487
Petitioner - Appellant:
SCOTT ASH JAMES ZIRUS
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Kelly v. Rupert et al
as 6:2014cv00291
Plaintiff:
James Earl Kelly
Defendant:
John A Rupert, Tammilyn McWhirter, Ashely K McKinley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zirus v. Stephens
as 5:2014cv00154
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephens
Petitioner:
Scott Ash James Zirus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zirus v. Stephens
as 1:2014cv00014
Petitioner:
Scott Ash James Zirus
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
