Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Antonio Carrothers v. East MS Corrtl Facil Empl, et al
as 18-60123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO CARROTHERS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY DEMPSEY, ARP Coordinator, OFFICER UNKNOWN TROTTER, Disciplinary Investigator, OFFICER UNKNOWN CHATTMAN, Disciplinary Investigator and others
Scooter Robinson v. Norris Hogans, et al
as 18-60006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOOTER LYNN ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN NORRIS HOGANS, VERNELL THOMAS, RAY RICE and others
Bias v. Shaw et al
as 3:2017cv00256
Plaintiff:
Orlando James Bias
Defendant:
Frank Shaw, Norris Hogan, K. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melton v. Shaw et al
as 3:2017cv00036
Plaintiff:
Barry Lemax Melton
Defendant:
Frank Shaw, Ray Rice, T. Donald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrothers v. East Mississippi Correctional Facility Employees
as 3:2016cv00982
Plaintiff:
Antonio Carrothers
Defendant:
East Mississippi Correctional Facility Employees, Mary Dempsey, Unknown Abangon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cloman v. USA
as 3:2016cv00942
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dempsey Cloman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Dempsey v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00704
Plaintiff:
Randy Dempsey
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dempsey v. Vincent et al
as 4:2016cv01598
Plaintiff:
Ernest H. Dempsey
Defendant:
Edgar Vincent, Cathy Vincent and Frank Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winding v. May et al
as 3:2015cv00714
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Benny McCalip May, Evelyn Fairley, Management Training Corp., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Hogen et al
as 3:2015cv00263
Plaintiff:
Scooter Lynn Robinson
Defendant:
Unknown Hogen, Unknown Thomas, Ray Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
