Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Wright v. Fair et al
as 5:2016cv00191
Plaintiff:
Lawrence R Wright
Defendant:
Fair, Robert Wyche, T Englade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Gusman et al
as 2:2015cv00244
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Marlin N. Gusman , Bonita J. Pittman , Ms. Weaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kerry Dupard, Sr. v. James Harper, et al
as 14-31271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KERRY CHARLES DUPARD, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES HARPER, DARRYL DERBIGNY, Honorable, VIRGINIA D. MILLER, Assistant District Attorney and others
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM JORDAN, Assistant District Attorney
Dupard v. Harper et al
as 2:2014cv00050
Plaintiff:
Kerry Charles Dupard, Sr.
Defendant:
James Harper, Darryl Derbigny, Virginia D. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley v. MSP/MDOC et al
as 4:2013cv00246
Plaintiff:
Christopher Allen Riley
Defendant:
MSP/MDOC, Walker and Gwenddolyn Fair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Davis et al
as 4:2013cv00003
Defendant:
Kevin Terrence Davis, Robert Sturdivant, Melvin Keaton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fair v. Thaler
as 1:2010cv00921
Petitioner:
Donald Alan Fair
Respondent:
Director Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fair v. Thaler
as 6:2010cv00327
Petitioner:
Donald Alan Fair
Respondent:
Director Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fair v. Croclet et al
as 2:2009cv04196
Plaintiff:
Justin Joseph Fair
Defendant:
Darren Croclet and Assumption Parish Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fair v. Croclet et al
as 3:2009cv00374
Plaintiff:
Justin Joseph Fair
Defendant:
Darren Croclet and Medical Staff of Assumption Parish Detention Center ETC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
