Cases 11 - 20 of 106
Johnson v. Franco et al
as 7:2020cv00026
Defendant:
Michael E Rutledge, Warden A Franco and TDCJ Executive Director
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Paul
as 3:2019cv00819
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Court of Criminal Appeals
as 9:2019cv00118
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Court of Criminal Appeals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Court of Criminal Appeals
as 6:2019cv00413
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Court of Criminal Appeals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Booker et al v. McDuffie et al
as 5:2018cv00208
Plaintiff:
Freddie Williams, Jamelle Scott, Ahmed Al-Sharz and others
Defendant:
Major Holly J Nunnelley and Senior Warden Charles McDuffie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Lafavers et al
as 7:2018cv00112
Defendant:
R Gonzales, M Moberley and J W Lafavers
Plaintiff:
R James Johnson and Richard James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Angelina County D.A. Office et al
as 2:2018cv00336
Defendant:
Angelina County D.A., Court of Criminal Appeals, Angelina County Defense Attorney Winfred III and others
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. McDuffie, et al
as 5:2018cv00217
Defendant:
Senior Warden Charles McDuffie and Major Holly J Nunnelley
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez et al v. Angelina County District Attorney's Office et al
as 9:2018cv00127
Plaintiff:
Miguel Mendez, Jacob Woodard, Margaret Black and others
Defendant:
Abel Acosta, Judge Paul White, The Estate of John Ross Kay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Johnson v. Richardson
as 18-11006
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD JAMES JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN RICHARDSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
