Cases 11 - 20 of 865
Jarvis v. Cain et al
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus L. Jarvis
Defendant:
Nathaniel Burl Cain, Jeworski Mallett, Timothy Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurst v. Pike County Jail
as 5:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Hurst
Defendant:
Pike County Jail, Suzanna Morris, Herbert Young and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Risby v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv02799
Petitioner:
William Morris Risby
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Morris v. USA
as 1:2023cv00323
Petitioner:
Darrell Ray Morris
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Morris v. Cain
as 23-60591
Petitioner / Appellant:
Christopher Morris, also known as Christopher Jermaine Morris
Respondent / Appellee:
Burl Cain, Commissioner of Mississippi Department of Corrections
Bullock v. Crane et al
as 4:2023cv04236
Plaintiff:
Brian Bullock
Defendant:
David Crane, Jason Brown, Isaiah Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Navarro County Justice System et al
as 3:2023cv02631
Plaintiff:
Broderick Hall
Defendant:
Navarro County Justice System, Hays, Corsicana Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. FCI El Reno
as 4:2023cv00999
Petitioner:
Tom Morris and Tom Franklin Morris
Respondent:
FCI El Reno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Morris v. Cerliano
as 6:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
Anthony Norman Morris
Defendant:
Maxey Cerliano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrell v. Turner
as 5:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Morris Andre Terrell
Defendant:
Lee Turner
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
