Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,093
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00192
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Robinson
as 24-50073
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Cornelius Robinson
Wilson v. Cain et al
as 3:2024cv00045
Plaintiff: Anthony Deundra Wilson
Defendant: Commisioner Burl Cain, MTC - Management & Training Corporation, East Mississippi Correctional Facility Administration and others
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hillman v. Hillman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2024cv00021
Plaintiff: Danny A. Hillman
Defendant: Michelle Hillman, Diane Robinson, Sugar Tiffany Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crotts v. Robinson
as 24-20014
Petitioner: Alan Nelson Crotts
Respondent: Reginald Robinson, Director of the Fort Bend Community Supervision and Corrections Department
Schubert v. Collier et al
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff: Christopher Francis Schubert
Defendant: Executive Director Brian Collier, C.F. Hazelwood, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00006
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Robinson v. Warden, FMC
as 4:2024cv00011
Petitioner: Raymond Robinson, III
Respondent: Warden, FMC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Reynolds v. Robinson
as 23-30923
Petitioner: Jeffrey Michael Reynolds
Respondent: Alvin Robinson, Warden, Nelson Coleman Correctional Center and Louisiana State
Robinson v. Warden, FMC
as 1:2023cv00449
Petitioner: Raymond Robinson, III
Respondent: Warden, FMC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?