Cases 11 - 20 of 178
Serrano v. Lumpkin
as 23-50527
Petitioner / Appellant:
Rosa Serrano
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03504
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Brown v. Rosa et al
as 4:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Brandon Brown
Defendant:
Luis Rosa, Jr., United States Marshal Service, Andrew Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Cleveland Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Darcell Kemp Taylor
Defendant:
Cleveland Police Department, J. Rosas and J. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whatley v. H&R Block Financial et al
as 4:2023cv01619
Plaintiff:
Joaquin Whatley
Defendant:
H&R Block Financial, Alex Bermudez, Rosa Maria Villanueva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez-Urbina v. Carruth et al
as 1:2023cv00343
Defendant:
Jose Javier Canales, Jose Jesus Delfierro, Gerald Carruth and others
Plaintiff:
Roberto Lopez-Urbina
Cortez v. Mathews et al
as 3:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Corey Cortez
Defendant:
Austee Mathews, V. Roberson, Lisa Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caceres v. Smith FMC Carswell
as 4:2023cv00031
Petitioner:
Jamileth Del Rosa Caceres
Respondent:
Smith FMC Carswell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Leija-Peralta v. USA
as 4:2022cv00743
Petitioner:
Rosa Leija-Peralta
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hays v. Lew Sterrite Jail
as 3:2022cv03258
Plaintiff:
Rosa Hays
Defendant:
Lew Sterrite Jail, Officer Thomas and Officer Bibins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
