Cases 11 - 20 of 154
Sterling v. 54th District Court, McLennan County, Texas
as 6:2023cv00645
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Sterling
Defendant:
54th District Court, McLennan County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shepherd v. HCSO et al
as 4:2023cv02853
Plaintiff:
Sterling Shepherd
Defendant:
HCSO, D.A. Office and State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trackling v. Sterling
as 3:2023cv00635
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Trackling
Defendant:
Unknown Sterling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sterling v. USA
as 23-10749
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Phillip Jay Sterling, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Incorporated
Sterling v. Lumpkin
as 1:2023cv00796
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee Sterling
Respondent:
Judge George H. Allen and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sterling v. The State of Texas
as 3:2023cv01432
Plaintiff:
Phillip Jay Sterling, Jr
Defendant:
The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sterling v. United States of America, INC.
as 4:2023cv00570
Plaintiff:
Phillip Jay Sterling, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sterling v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2023cv00562
Plaintiff:
Phillip Jay Sterling, Jr
Defendant:
The State of Texas, Ruben Gonzalez, Tarrant County, Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sterling v. Plaquemines Parish Detention Center, et al
as 2:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Kevin Robert Sterling
Defendant:
Rakeeme Rogers and Plaquemines Parish Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sterling v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2022cv01383
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee Sterling
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID Director
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
