Cases 21 - 30 of 99
Bolton v. Garner
as 1:2018cv00132
Plaintiff:
Charles Nevotney Bolton
Defendant:
Kenneth Garner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson vs Harris etal
as 9:2018cv00031
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lee Jackson
Defendant:
Todd E Harris, Tresea Jefferson, Blake Lamb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tawe v. Roesler
as 4:2017cv03404
Plaintiff:
Richard N. Tawe
Defendant:
Michael A Roesler, Charles H. Landis, Robert J. Jenkins, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Justice v. Warden Harris, et al
as 17-41093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY BARNARD JUSTICE
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN HARRIS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MCKINNEY, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LEBEAU and others
Taylor v. Hattiesburg Police Department et al
as 2:2017cv00099
Plaintiff:
Carlos Sanchez Taylor
Defendant:
Hattiesburg Police Department, Unknown Bolton, Unknown Calloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Bolton et al
as 9:2017cv00072
Plaintiff:
Pedro A Garcia
Defendant:
John P Bolton, Johnny R Farris, Sean R Burks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. TDCJ Personnel et al
as 9:2017cv00028
Plaintiff:
Sonny Wilson
Defendant:
TDCJ Personnel, Robert Eason, Hai Nguyen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Justice v. Lorie Davis, et al
as 17-40171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY BARNARD JUSTICE
Defendant - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, WILLIAM STEPHENS, Warden, WARDEN HARRIS and others
Raiford v. State of Mississippi et al
as 2:2016cv00174
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Raiford
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, County of Forrest, Mississippi, Betty Carlisle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Justice v. Stephens et al
as 9:2016cv00167
Plaintiff:
Ricky Barnard Justice
Defendant:
William Stephens, Warden Harris, Co. McKinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
