Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Mitchell v. Anderson et al
as 3:2012cv00936
Plaintiff:
Andrew Christopher Mitchell
Defendant:
Gary Anderson and Brandon Burch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Anderson et al
as 5:2012cv00936
Plaintiff:
Andrew Christopher Mitchell
Defendant:
Gary Anderson and Brandon Burch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chidester v. East Carroll Parish et al
as 3:2011cv01853
Plaintiff:
Robert D Chidester
Defendant:
Sheriffs Dept East Carroll Parish, Mark Shumate, Alvin Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. East Carroll Detention Center et al
as 3:2011cv01740
Plaintiff:
Cedric Adams
Defendant:
East Carroll Detention Center, Joseph Poche, Ronnie Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Anderson et al
as 3:2011cv01304
Plaintiff:
Andrew C Mitchell
Defendant:
Gary Anderson, Brandon Burch, Baily and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Florence v. Burch et al
as 9:2011cv00016
Plaintiff:
LC Florence
Defendant:
William Burch and Michael Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Florence v. Burch et al
as 4:2011cv00146
Plaintiff:
LC Florence
Defendant:
William Burch and Michael Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Secretary of the Interior et al
as 5:2010cv00164
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Secretary of the Interior, Assistant Director, Correctional Programs, Bruce Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Paseb v. Secretary of the Interior et al
as 5:2010cv00165
Defendant:
Secretary of the Interior, Assistant Director, Correctional Programs, Bruce Pearson and others
Plaintiff:
Aiwass Paseb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks et al v. Secretary of the Interior et al
as 5:2010cv00157
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks and Aiwass Paseb
Respondent:
Secretary of the Interior, Assistant Director, Correctional Programs, Bruce Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
