Cases 21 - 30 of 332
Campbell v. Lumpkin
as 23-40559
Petitioner / Appellant:
Reginald Vernard Campbell
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Stevenson v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv03443
Plaintiff:
John Stevenson
Defendant:
Mrs. Smith, Mrs. Campbell, Mrs. Vulture and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Star v. Campbell et al
as 1:2023cv00972
Plaintiff:
John Star, Elvis Ized and John Edos Star
Defendant:
Do Campbell, Dept of Homeland Security, Jody Floyd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Williams v. Perryman et al
as 6:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Defendant:
Judge Nancy Perryman, Judge Tony Duncan, Judge Scott McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Star v. Campbell et al
as 1:2023cv00991
Plaintiff:
John Edos Star and Elvis Izer
Defendant:
Do Campbell, Jody Floyd, Dept of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McMahon v. Campbell
as 3:2023cv00779
Petitioner:
James Cody McMahon
Defendant:
Warden Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boyd v. Sutton
as 23-60256
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dean C. Boyd
Defendant / Appellee:
Sylvia Sutton, Misty Hughes, Case Manager, Captain Campbell and others
Wright v. Abbott
as 23-10400
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Don Ameche Levern Wright
Defendant / Appellee:
Gregory Wayne Abbott, Cecelia Phalen Abbott, Farrel Chapman, Public Administrator and others
Campbell v. Johnson
as 1:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
Bryan Campbell
Defendant:
FNU Johnson and Mark Stiles Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Abbott et al
as 3:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
Don Ameche Levern Wright
Defendant:
Gregory Wayne Abbott, Cecilia Phalen Abbott, Farrel Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
