Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Darnell Wilson v. Christopher Epps, Commissioner, et al
as 13-60574
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARNELL WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAMES HOLMAN, Warden at Central Mississippi Correctional Facility, MARGARETT BINGHAM, Superintendent at Central Mississippi Correctional Facility and others
Martinez v. Wathen et al
as 7:2013cv00076
Plaintiff:
Juan Martinez
Defendant:
Richard E Wathen, Jonathan R Eaststep, David R Skelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arevalo v. M.T.C. et al
as 4:2013cv00083
Plaintiff:
William Arevalo
Defendant:
M.T.C., GEO Group Inc., D. McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cates v. USA
as 3:2013cv01130
Petitioner:
Russell Cates
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Cates v. USA
as 3:2013cv00904
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Russell Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Alejandro Machuca v. Matthew Cate et al
as 3:2013cv00017
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Machuca
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, J W Moss, R Floweree and others
Garner v. Epps et al
as 3:2012cv00769
Plaintiff:
James Emory Garner
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt L. Sparkman, James Holman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Unknown 6/5/2012 Memo Transmitter et al
as 3:2013cv00982
Plaintiff:
Eric De'Juan Jones
Defendant:
E. L. Sparkman , Unknown EMCF Discliplinary Records Custodian, Unknown EMCF ERS Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Epps et al
as 4:2012cv00038
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Crawford
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, E. L. Sparkman, Earnest Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Dixon et al
as 4:2012cv00018
Plaintiff:
Julius M. Howard
Defendant:
Lynn Dixon, Mildred Rome, Eddie Cates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
