Cases 21 - 30 of 722
Broussard v. Strength et al
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Neil Patrick Broussard
Defendant:
Bryan Strength, Correctional Officer and Correctional Deputy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Bennett et al
as 1:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Freeman Brooks
Defendant:
FNU Bennett, Sgt. FNU Reynolds, FNU Silva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lozano v. Licon et al
as 7:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Thomas B. Lozano
Defendant:
Correctional Officer FNU Licon, Police Officer FNU Studder/Potter and Ector County Detention Center Administrators and Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salas v. Correctional Officer Acosta et al
as 4:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Salas
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Acosta and Correctional Officer Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Oguzie
as 24-40092
Plaintiff:
LaMarkus K. Hill
Defendant:
Benedict C. Oguzie, Correction Officer III
Schubert v. Avery
as 23-60644
Plaintiff:
Allan Schubert
Defendant:
Krystal Avery, Correctional Officer
Liscano v. Ligon et al
as 7:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Michael Liscano
Defendant:
Sgt. A. Ligon, Lt. A. Ligon, Sgt. Andrew Ligon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salas v. Correctional Officer Acosta et al
as 4:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Salas, Gabriel Salascio and Gabriel Paul Salas
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Acosta and Correctional Officer Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haney v. Haines et al
as 7:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Thomas Haney
Defendant:
Correctional Officer FNU Haines, Midland County Detention Center, Sheriff David Criner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Scoggins et al
as 7:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Raul Sanchez
Defendant:
Correctinal Officer FNU Scoggins, Correctional Officer FNU Carbojal and Correctional Officer FNU Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
