Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Young v. USA
as 5:2016cv00103
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Marvin Gay Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Watson v. United States of America
as 7:2016cv00293
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Dodionne Gay Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brignac v. Smith et al
as 2:2015cv04907
Plaintiff:
David Brignac
Defendant:
Frederick Smith, Robert Stoltz, Paul D. Connick, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. LeBlanc et al
as 5:2015cv02087
Plaintiff:
Eddie Gene Evans
Defendant:
James M LeBlanc, Burl Cain, Barry Matheney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gay v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2015cv00369
Defendant:
Burl Cain and James M. LeBlanc
Plaintiff:
Roderick L. Gay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PELAYO v. SUTTON et al
as 3:2014cv00342
Defendant:
KATHLEEN CARDONE, JOSEP GAY, Steve Garcia and others
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Plaintiff:
JUAN MANUEL SAHAGUN PELAYO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. United States Of America
as 7:2014cv00075
Defendant:
United States Of America
Plaintiff:
Dodionne Gay Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Joshua Conlan v. USA, et al
as 13-51066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSHUA ADAM CONLAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JUDGE ANDREW AUSTIN, ELIZABETH COTTINGHAM and others
Mims v. Bales et al
as 9:2013cv00248
Plaintiff:
Brenda Gay Mims
Defendant:
John Malcolm Bales, Brittain Albert Featherston and John R Heath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mims v. Bales et al
as 3:2013cv03625
Plaintiff:
Brenda Gay Mims
Defendant:
John Malcolm Bales, Brittain Albert Featherston and John R Heath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
