Cases 21 - 30 of 79
Hill v. Jones et al
as 3:2019cv00079
Plaintiff:
James Irvin Hill
Defendant:
Antwan Jones, Earthaleen Brown Smith, Sheriff Jimmy Fly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Blakely v. Andrade
as 3:2018cv03229
Respondent:
Candance Carlsen, Brandon Howell, Dallas County and others
Petitioner:
Quincy Blakely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Peters v. State of Texas et al
as 6:2018cv00464
Defendant:
Texas Medical Board, State of Texas, Barbara Gladden Adamick and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Geoffrey Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2018cv02922
Defendant:
Ray George, R Lenning and Ed Gonzalez
Plaintiff:
Irvin Omara Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Hill et al
as 3:2018cv00139
Plaintiff:
James Irvin Hill
Defendant:
Paul A. Hill, Frank W. Hill, William Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Ogg et al
as 4:2018cv00496
Plaintiff:
Irvin Dixon
Defendant:
Kim Ogg, Ed Gonzalez, Harris County Public Defenders Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruz v. Washington et al
as 5:2018cv00035
Defendant:
Major FNU Castleberry, Monica Delavasco, John/Jane Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Baez Cruz, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irvin v. Trump
as 4:2017cv00998
Petitioner:
Jermaine Duane Irvin
Respondent:
Donald J. Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bobo v. Irvin et al
as 3:2017cv00568
Plaintiff:
Jason J. Bobo
Defendant:
L. T. Irvin, K. Gooden and J. Leaper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Aloin Benitez-Mendoza
as 17-60457
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALOIN BENITEZ-MENDOZA, also known as Sael Orsos, also known as Alver Rian Sosa, also known as Irvin Oslas, also known as Arias, also known as Irvin Ariasolsas, also known as Aloin M. Benites, also known as Ramon Benitezmendoza, also known as Alver Rian, a
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
