Cases 21 - 30 of 46
King v. United States Of America Do not docket in this case. Docket entries should be made in 2:15cr574.
as 2:2016cv00434
Petitioner:
John Lee King
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jordan v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv00457
Petitioner:
John Lee Jordan
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lee v. Louisiana State Penitentiary Angola et al
as 3:2016cv00368
Respondent:
Jeff Landry and Louisiana State Penitentiary Angola
Petitioner:
John Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Roane v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-20281
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN LEE ROANE
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
John Johnson v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-10518
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN LEE JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Thomas v. Stephen
as 1:2016cv00066
Petitioner:
John Lee Thomas
Respondent:
William Stephen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
John Cockerham, Jr. v. J. Willi
as 16-50172
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN LEE COCKERHAM, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
J. S. WILLIS, Warden
Cockerham v. Willis
as 3:2015cv00382
Petitioner:
John Lee Cockerham, Jr.
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Respondent:
Warden J.S. Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2015cv00311
Petitioner:
John Lee Johnson
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Posey v. United States Of America
as 7:2015cv00171
Plaintiff:
John Lee Posey
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
