Cases 21 - 30 of 56
McClure v. Paxton et al
as 5:2019cv00826
Defendant:
Michael Miller, Jennifer Tharp, John Doe #5 and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Troy McClure
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Doctor Freeman et al
as 4:2019cv01563
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe #5, John Doe #4 and others
Plaintiff:
Milton Leon Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClure v. Collier et al
as 5:2019cv00388
Defendant:
Jennifer Tharp, Jessi Valdez, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Robert T. McClure
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Management & Training Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv00533
Defendant:
Centurion of Mississippi, Inc., Unknown Nagel, Norris Hogans and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Jason Bruce Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnett v. Warden John Doe 4 et al
as 4:2018cv00438
Plaintiff:
Leon Thomas Burnett
Defendant:
Warden John Doe 4, John Doe 1 White, John Doe 2 Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mohammed Omran v. Robert Wyche, et al
as 18-30042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMMED AHMED HASSAN AB OMRAN
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT WYCHE, STEVE PRATOR, ARDISE HICKS and others
Perrette v. Jackson County ADC et al
as 1:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
James Monroe Perrette
Defendant:
Jackson County ADC, Unknown Splicer, Unknown Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teague v. Doe #1 et al
as 2:2016cv00227
Plaintiff:
Christopher Paul Teague
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wetzel v. Tanner et al
as 2:2016cv05765
Plaintiff:
Andrew Wetzel
Defendant:
Robert Tanner, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Executive Director et al
as 1:2016cv00017
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice Executive Director, Eddy Wheeler, Formby Unit State Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dean Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
